الادلة الاقناعية في ترجيح المعنى دراسة في شروح ديوان المتنبي
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021-09-29
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The issue of weighting and persuasion has been mentioned by
the fundamentalists regarding the conflict between two or
more evidence and they have laid down conditions for this.
Because if the two evidences are equal in consistency and
strength, it is not possible to give preference between them,
and if they are united in place, time and direction, it is not
possible to combine them, nor is it possible to say that one is
abrogated by the other.
What is meant by the conflict between the evidence and the
preponderance of persuasion between them according to the
grammarians is the occurrence of the preponderance between
the conflicting evidence, and the talk of the grammatical
scholars about the conflict and the preponderance is one of the
effects of the principles of jurisprudence that cannot be
separated from it. Because the fundamentalists of the jurists
have been concerned with weighing between the evidence that
is thought to be in conflict, just as the grammarians of the
fundamentalists have meant by the weighing between the
conflicting evidence in grammar.
The most important evidence for grammatical rules is listening;
It is represented in the Qur’anic verses, the hadiths of the
Prophet, and the words of the eloquent Arabs whose words are
invoked in poetry or prose; To elaborate on the evidence for
persuasion and linguistic pilgrims, I chose three of them for
reasoning, inference, and weighting. The importance of the
topic and the reasons for choosing it lie in:
1- It is a subject of linguistic persuasion and weighting.
2- Tracing Al-Mutanabbi’s commentators and extracting
persuasive evidence for them.
3- The skill of rhetorical persuasion in choosing the meaning
and its impact and influence through the explanations of Al-
Mutanabbi.
The objectives of the study were:
1- Finding persuasive linguistic evidence that enables the
meaning to be singularly or combined with it and not to
contradict it.
2- Mention the difference in persuasive evidence if it is
mentioned with weighting.
3- To highlight the clearest types of persuasive rational
evidence of reasoning, inference and weighting.
4- Unveiling the ingenuity of the Arabic language in its
semantics by persuasion and not leaving it to luck, which
weighs on its originality.
In this study, I relied on some printed and verified explanations