باسم ريحان مغامس الشميساويأ.د صالح جعيول جويعد السراي2025-05-192025-05-192013-10-19https://dspace.utq.edu.iq/handle/123456789/1006The Lebanese civil war is regarded as one of the most important events that stormed modern Lebanon . It was dangerous because it really embodied what was the Lebanese society suffering from sectarian and religious division in all its layers. The war was also dangerous because Lebanon became the place of territorial, Arab and international disputes. The interests of states was different among them. Every one wanted to achieve is agenda and interests in the Lebanese territories. The only losing party is the Lebanese people which suffered a lot from destruction tragedies and death of its people. The attitudes of Arab states concerning this war were different. Some participated in this war directly , others indirectly according to its interests. Some of these states was Saudi Arabia kingdom as one of the most important players. It had a prominent role in this war since the beginning of this war up to signing on Al-Taif Agreement which put the bases to end the war in Lebanon in 1989. This attitude had been studied in a preface, three chapters and conclusion. The preface has dealt with the nature of Saudi-Lebanese relationships from 1975 up to 1974 in three subjects. The first one tackled the unstable relationships between Saudi Arabia and Lebanon 1957-1963. The second subject discussed the tension of these relationships between 1964-1969. The third subject dealt with the return of the positive Saudi Lebanese relationships between 1970-1974. The first chapter focused on the Saudi attitude towards the civil war between 1975-1978 in three subjects. The first subject shed light on the beginning of the war and the reason behind it in addition to the Saudi attitude towards it. The second subject dealt with the attitude of Saudi Arabia kingdom about the direct military Syrian intervention in Lebanon. The third subject showed the activity of the kingdom which aimed at solving the crisis by Al-Riyadh sixfold and Cairo conferences and quadripartite committee in addition Bait Al-Deen conference in 1978. The second chapter was devoted to study the unstable Saudi attitude about the civil war between 1979-1982 in two subjects. The first one was allocated to the Saudi retreat concerning the war in Lebanon after the failure of Bait Al-Deen conference and the attempt to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Lebanon in Lebanon. The second subject shed light on the Saudi return to play its natural role in Lebanon in 1981 after recognizing the mistake of its previous step which led to Syrian intervention was deceive to end Zehla battle and the crisis of the Syrian missiles . The third chapter dealt with escalating the Saudi attitude 1983-1989. This chapter was divided into three subjects. The first one focused on the Israli-Lebanese Agreement on 17-May-1983 and conferences of Jeneva and Lozan due to their connection with significance of the agreement. The second subject dealt with tripartite agreement concerning circumstances of its foundation and failure. The third subject shed light on Taif conference in 1989 and the beginning of Lebanese civil war end. Finally we can say that the Saudi attitude towards the Lebanese civil war was not on the same manner. It was unstable according to the development of events in Lebanon and its reflections in the area in addition to the private Saudi interests. We can also say that the Saudi Arabia kingdom could restore to Lebanon by ending this war in Al-Taif conference in 1989 which is regarded the top of success of the Saudi diplomacytext::thesis::master thesis